<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Eyes of the Pineapple &#187; Tong Reasathea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://padevat.info/author/tong-reasathea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://padevat.info</link>
	<description>resource on a disaster</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>


   
		<item>
		<title>1966: We are Pure Gold, Monkey Dance, Golden Era &#8211; Jerk and Twist from the Gentle Land</title>
		<link>http://padevat.info/2010/05/21/1jerk-and-twist-from-the-gentle-land/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=1jerk-and-twist-from-the-gentle-land</link>
		<comments>http://padevat.info/2010/05/21/1jerk-and-twist-from-the-gentle-land/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 04:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tong Reasathea</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://padevat.info/?p=4837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an excerpt from the novel of Ros Chantrabot titled The Husband, Master of all his Wife&#8217;s Feelings, or Mchas bdey duong chet oun. Ros Chantrabot is the author of La Republique Khmere and other books, but there&#8217;s a small chance that there were two authors with the same name. The novel was published in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } -->Here&#8217;s an excerpt from the novel of Ros Chantrabot titled <em>The Husband, Master of all his Wife&#8217;s Feelings</em>, or <em>Mchas bdey duong chet oun</em>. Ros Chantrabot is  the author of <em>La Republique Khmere</em> and other books, but there&#8217;s a small chance that there were two authors with the same name. The novel was published in 1966, in the heyday of Sihanouk&#8217;s Sangkum regime and presents quite a tragic story of love between the daughter of one wealthy family (Kuntea) and a certain Rith, a <em>professeur.</em> The author in the presented introduction poses the  question in an almost Herzen style “Who is guilty, who is to blame?”  Of course the <em>undemocratic</em> Sihanouk regime did not allow direct criticisms so all such things had to be done an indirect fashion.   In the dialogue of the first chapter we see references to Shakespeare, Kim Il Sung&#8217;s “self-reliance” doctrine, popular liberal ideas of rejecting the old order, old notions of marriage and other aspects of traditional social relationships.  It is a good piece showing the inside as it were, the <em>derriere le sourire khmer </em>(behind the Khmer smile). First I thought about translating the paragraph “We Are the Pure Gold” but ended up translating the whole chapter. The division of society is clearly shown by the remark of the mother and there is perhaps not a single example similar to this in other Khmer literature. The deep division was unnoticed by the majority of outsiders but it still exists in today&#8217;s society.  </p>
<p>First off, here&#8217;s a clip from a film called <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBVNnBLFHnA&amp;feature=player_embedded#!">Monkey Dance</a>,  made by contemporary Khmer-American artist Laura Mam featuring a well-to-do 1966 New Year party. It is worth comparing this <em>elite</em> with despised Cambodian peasants in ragged clothes.  Just a little monkey dance. The feast in times of plague. Such a good piece of propaganda, where nobody sees the irony.</p>
<p lang="en-US">Eleven years of social order will be destroyed and the likes of Rith, the rejected, will lead the struggle and be the destroyers. What would happen to the mother and father of Kuntea? They would probably be lead outside of Phnom Penh and overworked or executed. There&#8217;s a symbolism between the Khmer Rouge rejection of money (gold) and  the Khmer Rouge getting rid of the old elite (We are the Gold). Anyways, it&#8217;s a good example showing a true attitude of the elite, and there&#8217;s no rehabilitation in my opinion. Look at the paragraph where mother tells to her daughter to get rid off the baby. It&#8217;s not a single, known to me, case in the Khmer literature. It&#8217;s an elites&#8217; desire not to mix, physically mix the blood with lower classes of society. All the defenders of the <em>golden</em> Sihanouk era should read the novels. It reminds me too of an early Russian play from the 19th century called <em>The Storm</em>. The main heroine dies there too and the prominent Russian critic Dobrolyubov called her “The ray of light in the dark kingdom”. The Khmer heroine can be called so too.  Pol Pot&#8217;s judgement of a rotten and old Khmer society cannot be dispensed just because he was a “bad guy.”  And in today&#8217;s Cambodia under former Khmer Rouge Hun Sen, there&#8217;s <em>aek otdom</em>, <em>okhna</em>, <em>somdech</em>, <em>somdech techo</em>, <em>look chumteav</em>, <em>somdech krom</em>, and these are all old titles still officially used.  And those holding them get feuds (I mean land privileges). Anyway,  here&#8217;s an excerpt:</p>
<p><img src="http://padevat.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/rsz_1picture_132.jpg" alt="" title="" width="664" height="944" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4843" /></p>
<p>– Daughter, you have to listen to your mom. The mom who gave birth to you has got a better head than you. You have to understand me clearly. Now, this mom who hasn&#8217;t spoken much, but she means just one thing, daughter, you have to stop this love with the contemptible Rith (further <em>a-</em>Rith). Your face, your rank, your family line are famous to everyone. It&#8217;s not proper to bring it down, through the dirt and mud. Or smash it by involving yourself with indecent trash. <em><strong>We are the pure gold and we have to stay the pure gold never mixing with silver or iron</strong></em><em>.</em> Why don&#8217;t you listen to me?</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– Mom, all these lengthy words that you said, I&#8217;ve understood everything.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– If so you have to do like I&#8217;ve told you. What I told you have to follow.</p>
<p>– Yes&#8230; but.. I love <em>bong</em> Rith immeasurably. <em><strong>My heart, my feelings and myself are all I&#8217;ve entrusted to him without reserve. Everything what I have also belongs to him. My things are also his (belongs  to him). His life is mine. The two of us have only one life</strong></em><em>.</em> Our life is a profitless sacrifice on the altar.  The love of your daughter has found happiness and I hope <em>bong</em> Rith and I will join  with each even more in the future.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p>– ”Pure life!&#8221; Found “happiness!&#8221; Oh, my God let me handle this! Love made in secret against our Khmer traditions! And she tries to tell me further about what is “pure” and “good”. How can you find happiness with an indecent and cowardly figure like <em>a-</em>Rith who hasn&#8217;t got a penny in his pocket! You are confused my child. You&#8217;re daydreaming! You have to listen your mom. I&#8217;m older than you and I&#8217;ve got more experience than you.  Believe me, happiness is determined by money. If one has money one&#8217;s already got happiness. And whatever we want to buy we can with money. There will be no difficulties!</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p>– No, mom! As for me I don&#8217;t agree with this! Happiness, for me and <em>bong</em> Rith is based on love and understanding, on knowing each other. By knowing each other we live in happiness. Money does not disrupt our happiness. <em><strong>Money cannot deliver to us happiness. It can only destroy it</strong></em><em>!</em> When you were born, did any money come with you? You came without anything, naked. And when you die, do you take any money with you? Why do you have such a love for money then?</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– Eh! Don&#8217;t you dare to throw such big words in my face.  Your share (of truth) is smaller than mine. It&#8217;s money that is bigger than everything and it bring us contentment and benefits. Without money where would you live, slut! Look at the Yankees. Because they are bursting with money they can reach out to any country and they lead everybody! Everybody fears them because off those big money bags. Americans can buy anybody from any country, and it doesn&#8217;t matter whether little or big, to serve them for their own benefit. Look clearly with your eyes. Do you agree with me or not? Because of money their country enjoys greatness.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– Mom, happiness is not based on, physical outlook, strength, wealth or power. It&#8217;s based on feelings. But people are unable to touch its form, sketch it out or weigh it. It is the money side, the money and the value of all the things based on it that they are able to see around themselves. They&#8217;re confused and they&#8217;re dreaming.</p>
<p><em><strong>Almost all the people live with a wrong understanding</strong></em><em>.</em> There&#8217;s not a single correct one. And the money and the things and all the deeds it&#8217;s like when small children are competing when playing with toys. Our world is based in such a way that each person appears as if entering an arena, or always acting a play. Bringing themselves to quarrels and bickering, killing each other to get money.</p>
<p lang="en-US">All the people playing with these toys don&#8217;t know that money is a poison. It poisons everybody like an opium which is smoked by people, first delicious and then “more-more”. It makes them skinny and deprived but they don&#8217;t know. Our world and our lives are like a play. Not real. Mom, you were born among the suffering, and a little bit more and we croak like animals, always the same.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– Hey, don&#8217;t you say crazy things. I raised you since you were small. I will not let you rule out whatever comes in your head. In this manner you will bring down our good name.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p>– Good name! What&#8217;s in it!? As you already know I&#8217;m pregnant for more than two months and the baby is consummated with <em>bong</em> Rith.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– Don&#8217;t worry! Mom&#8217;s got all the means and two months is nothing. We can abort it. Stop loving <em>a</em>-Rith. We&#8217;ll ease it out of you. Believe your mom!</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p>– No, and no again! I don&#8217;t want to end the life of a human being! And I cannot forget <em>bong</em> Rith., my love, my destiny.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">-Think it over, thoroughly. He&#8217;s lacking everything, if you follow what I&#8217;m saying you will have income and will raise our name further. Because you have to be grateful to your mother and father. Think of Li Pon Ton, he wants you so much! And he will not be a step back. The vice governor of a certain province, he&#8217;s not small. He rules over the whole province, daughter! He also makes lots of money beside that. People fear and respect him a lot. When you go anywhere, make an appearance, people would call you <em>look chumteav</em>. Look, isn&#8217;t it good? But not only this. His father is a boss of a joint silk company. He&#8217;s got a lots of money, his means are inexhaustible. They live in the bags of money.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– Even it is so I cannot do what you tell and what you order me, mom. I cannot change my heart kill my baby. Moreover, my love does not have a price for which it can be purchased. 10 governors, 1100 bosses of silk companies will not be able to buy my love.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– Don&#8217;t speak so much bullshit. You speak without thinking it over. You&#8217;re still green, a baby. Don&#8217;t know anything of life yet. You&#8217;ve heard what they call “love” and you only know it from the books or movies. They only set you out as ignorant and will bring you only you tears. Don&#8217;t go crazy over all these writers. They&#8217;re all mad. If you get a copy of a book or some story it is just bullshit. They don&#8217;t give a thought to serve literature for a great cause. Know this. Don&#8217;t go crazy. Get this and don&#8217;t think more. Oh, all children nowadays are stupid, cannot pre-plan anything in advance.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– I don&#8217;t want to speak on this. It&#8217;s a problem of my future and my happiness which is opposed. I thought a bit and I decided not to bother you, mom, on deciding my life. Because you&#8217;ve taken care for me since I was small. And this is why I want you to give me a free choice on what stands before me. By the way, everyone is the master of his own destiny. If you don&#8217;t do good, then bad you will get.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– What stubborness! Your problem is me, who rules over you. Because it&#8217;s a question of family honor. I will insist we find a good husband for you with an according position and good background. There is only one difficulty and that is to abort the child. Throw it out and it will be over. Go wed and then it&#8217;s done.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– About my baby and my wedding with some certain gentleman I ask you. This is an ultimately mine. I will take care of my child with good, pure intentions, me and my husband.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– If it&#8217;s so, then we&#8217;re with your dad we will not let you marry Rith. If you have decided so I will not lose my honor or sign it over Etat Civile.</p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– I&#8217;ve thought it all over. Because this is mine. <em><strong>Whether there&#8217;s a wedding or no I don&#8217;t care. The main thing that two of us love each other. The marriage is just a childish play in which boring people find an amusement. In truth, the marriage doesn&#8217;t have any magical power to add or to strength the bonds of love. It doesn&#8217;t matter.. </strong></em></p>
<p lang="en-US">
<p lang="en-US">– Ungrateful bitch! Don&#8217;t you speak too much. I will set you on the perch that you never wanted to be set on. Go love your<em> </em>Rith. He&#8217;s without penny, his family is nothing. If you go and marry this <em>professeur</em> no generals or tycoons will ever respect you where you go. He&#8217;s got no decent face. Or you think like these people, like this gang of <em>professeurs</em>? Don&#8217;t be mistaken, they will call you only as <em>neak</em> or <em>neak srey</em>. That&#8217;s it. The governor is like a wall to rest upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://padevat.info/2010/05/21/1jerk-and-twist-from-the-gentle-land/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinit River: Third Congress of the Communist Party of Kampuchea</title>
		<link>http://padevat.info/2010/04/09/third-congress-of-the-communist-party-of-kampuchea/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=third-congress-of-the-communist-party-of-kampuchea</link>
		<comments>http://padevat.info/2010/04/09/third-congress-of-the-communist-party-of-kampuchea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tong Reasathea</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://padevat.info/?p=3525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1971, the Chinit River Congress. I took the part. There, it was stated that “Vietnam is a friend but with reservations&#8221; (or contradictions). This decision meant that Vietnam was not a real ally in the struggle, but also ambiguously not a foe too. We had to apply two lines, one of friendship and the other, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><a href="http://padevat.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Pol-Pot-speaks.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3524" src="http://padevat.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Pol-Pot-speaks-300x225.png" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></center></p>
<blockquote><p>1971, the Chinit River Congress.  I took the part.   There, it was stated that “Vietnam is a friend but with reservations&#8221; (or contradictions). This decision meant that Vietnam was not a real ally in the struggle, but also ambiguously not a foe too. We had to apply two lines, one of friendship and the other, of struggle. If Vietnam was a friend then it meant that those who supported Vietnam were friends too. Although they didn&#8217;t support armed struggle. To take into consideration what is mentioned above, So Phim was wrong and Ta Mok was wrong too. So Phim was wrong because the decision of the congress declared that Vietnam is the friend with reservations and he still cooperated with them excessively.  Ta Mok and Ke Pauk were wrong because they used killing to deal with those who followed Vietnam. This is how Pol Pot tried to resolve things for everybody, expressing the Party line which stood above everybody and everything.</em></p>
<p>Why were the decisions taken at this congress left hidden from ordinary Party members?  This was because of the following:</em></p>
<ol>
<li><em>The fear that a leaking of knowledge of the PKK&#8217;s existence could damage or break up the relationship with the FUNK and Sihanouk.</em></li>
<li><em>The problems discussed and decisions made on Vietnam. Who and what was Vietnam regarding the struggle of the Khmer Communists?  The further decisions on the Party line could not be taken without resolving the origin of this question. </li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p></em></p>
<p>Taken from Khieu Samphan&#8217;s <em>Reflections on  Cambodian History</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://padevat.info/2010/04/09/third-congress-of-the-communist-party-of-kampuchea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex and Angkar</title>
		<link>http://padevat.info/2010/03/28/sex-and-angkar/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=sex-and-angkar</link>
		<comments>http://padevat.info/2010/03/28/sex-and-angkar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 06:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tong Reasathea</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://padevat.info/?p=3248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an important topic and it cannot be described by a single article. Therefore it is just the beginning of the story. The story about sexual politics of Democratic Kampuchea and sexual politics in the context of a contemporary Marxist thought. The sole reality about gender relationship in DK was that they were forced. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3249" src="http://padevat.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/webpreview_htm_11903378-300x227.gif" width="300" height="227" />This is an important topic and it cannot be described by a single article. Therefore it is just the  beginning of the story. The story about sexual politics of Democratic Kampuchea and sexual politics in the context of a contemporary Marxist thought. The sole reality about gender relationship in DK was that they were forced. Forced in majority cases without regard to wishes and reservations of newlyweds. This, at one time was one of the things that confused me the most in DK. I could not bear the notion of the forced marriages, being raised on humanist Russian literature, where one of the most hated and fought thing for writers was a forced  marriage. It also seemed to be completely away from progressive Marxist ideas of free love and casual sex. There were none of it in Kampuchea. The marriage was forced and the sex was procreative. Husband and wife could meet each other every 10 days. To consummate. To beget the future children. Not for a pleasure, for DK seemed didn&#8217;t know this word. So there was a completely different practice from Angkar which formally shared Marxist ideology.</p>
<p lang="en-US">The absolute requirement for the correct marriage was the correct class position. Only those who belonged to the same class could marry each other. And only those who were deemed worthy by Party or occupied higher positions could chose or reject their spouse. Thus Hun Sen while serving as a division commander refused to marry the daughter of his chief, he eventually was allowed to marry Bun Rany. Though most of the Khmer Rouge leaders came from rich and bourgeois background they were eager to build the pure proletarian elite. The class position was everything in the future Kampuchea, autobiography, required for the most cadres was made to support of disapprove claim for a higher role.</p>
<p>“To strengthen revolutionary stand” meant to follow the line of Angkar. “Throw away feelings and compassion take the fierce stand in struggle”. Thus marriages were considered the matter too important to just happen. Words “love” and “sympathy” were exchanged for “class struggle” and “class hate”. To love meant to love your class and thus marriage was made an act of the class position. “In class society, everyone lives as a member of a particular class, and every kind of thinking, without exception, is stamped with the brand of a class.” Angkar little corrected Mao&#8217;s thought. Everything had to be taken from the class position. Thus Angkar outran Marx in Marxist consistency. They fought  everything that capitalist society has left, exchanging it for revolutionary models.</p>
<p>To challenge the idea of “forced” we should not forget that this word is used as an act of making somebody to do something. And it&#8217;s bad. It challenges our thoughts of freedom and free choice. But where the studies that “forced” in gender relationship is not a needed thing? Where studies of what is really needed in gender relationship? Does gender relationship have to just limit itself by a random act of a random meeting somewhere in the bar or a nightclub? Or maybe gender relationship is something to be closely controlled and planned? Angkar knew the answer. Angkar didn&#8217;t let the world know about its experiments otherwise it risked to lose the majority of supporters. And Angkar was made the only object to love&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://padevat.info/2010/03/28/sex-and-angkar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Post: Tong Reasathea</title>
		<link>http://padevat.info/2010/02/05/new-post/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=new-post</link>
		<comments>http://padevat.info/2010/02/05/new-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tong Reasathea</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://padevat.info/?p=2410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The offer to contribute to this blog dedicated to the history of Khmer Communism and the culmination of some of its tendencies in the state of Democratic Kampuchea, came to me unexpectedly, but it is probably something that I almost readily agreed upon, due to feelings of competence to do so. Democratic Kampuchea has occupied [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://padevat.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/polpot.jpg" alt="" title="" width="301" height="368" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2474" />  The offer to contribute to this blog dedicated to the history of Khmer Communism and the culmination of some of its tendencies in the state of Democratic Kampuchea, came to me unexpectedly, but it is probably something that I almost readily agreed upon, due to feelings of competence to do so.   Democratic Kampuchea has occupied my thoughts and fascinated me since the very time I read a short biographical note in a Soviet encyclopedia which stated that &#8220;Pol Pot &#8211; leader of a <em>levacky</em> (which is a variation of the Russian word for &#8220;left&#8221; but with a vulgar undertone) group called the Red Khmers, as well as with old news shots showing a pile of human skulls collected inside a building ruined by war.</p>
<p>Who were Khmer Rouge and what their contribution was (is) to us is an interesting topic to research. I think I&#8217;m well equipped as an author, or at least I&#8217;ll be trying his best. Hopefully there will be no disappointment.  Besides, I have a blog dedicated to the building of a new man utilizing the Cambodian experience of communism, left matters, Buddhism, Traditionalism, healthy living. Here, however, I will contribute exclusively to Cambodian and Khmer Rouge topics as the name of the blog indicates &#8211; padewat.info.  Information about padewat, and nothing else.</p>
<p>It is not just about all the killing in the name of abrogating multi-formed suffering, besides there were other influences and factors which fed into what happened, and if there had been none of the above, my fascination with Democratic Kampuchea would be the same.  What  Democratic Kampuchea was, and could have been, is worthy of interest not only because of its genocidal &#8220;practices.&#8221; On the contrary, to understand the killing, it requires that decent attention be given to the ideological choices made by the Khmer Communists in creating their new polity.</p>
<p>I want to single out here the words of the French traditionalist Rene Guenon who said that to be human is a <em>&#8220;transitory and contingent modification of being&#8221;</em> and Friedrich Engels once wrote that&#8217; <em>&#8220;life is the mode of existence of protein bodies.&#8221;</em>  Democratic Kampuchea was a state where oppression of the individual became the corner stone of its policy. An individual was a mere <em>&#8220;contingent modification,&#8221;</em> <em>&#8220;a fertilizer.&#8221;</em> <em>&#8220;Death is either the dissolution of the organic body, leaving nothing behind but the chemical constituents that formed its substance&#8230;  Living means dying.&#8221;</em>   It makes Democratic Kampuchea very close to some religious sects and its brand of communism akin to some sort of state religion.  But a religion without the scriptures!   This was so unusual for most of the other Communist-ruled states.  An Orwellian reference can be made, for we all know that where there is a Big Brother, so too in the Cambodian context, is the Brother Number One, or <em>bong ti muy</em>.  Also to quote Andrei Platonov from his dystopian novel <em>Chevengur</em>: <em>&#8220;We might organize some grief.  Communism must be caustic, a little bit of poison in the soup is good for the taste&#8221;</em>.</p>
<p>Accidentally, the heroes of <em>Chevengur</em> were worried by the same problems as those faced by the Khmer Rouge &#8211; on how to build the purest brand of communism.   And the former and the latter didn&#8217;t know the &#8220;classics.&#8221; There&#8217;s going to be a good comparison article of Platonov&#8217;s <em>Chevengur</em> and Democratic Kampuchea.</p>
<p>Even today Democratic Kampuchea stays aside. It&#8217;s a unique experience which deserves to be studied.  What has attracted David Chandler, Ben Kiernan, Stephen Heder, Michael Vickery and others?   Of course it&#8217;s much deeper than a remark made by Chandler that &#8220;those people were just stupid.&#8221;  There&#8217;s going to be two different worlds between that of a Western professor and an uneducated farmer turned guerilla and revolutionary.  You can never know 100 percent, even though you might guess, or you might construct, recreate times and places, all the variables which contribute to the motivations of people. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://padevat.info/2010/02/05/new-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
